Home Boating & Fishing Fishing Advocates Rally Against Regulation That Could ‘Cripple’ Fluke Fishing

Fishing Advocates Rally Against Regulation That Could ‘Cripple’ Fluke Fishing

3
SHARE
NJDEP Commissioner Bob Martin addresses the crowd assembled at a rally against proposed fluke regulations, Jan. 27, 2017. (File Photo)
NJDEP Commissioner Bob Martin addresses the crowd assembled at a rally against proposed fluke regulations, Jan. 27, 2017. (File Photo)

Elected officials and recreational fishermen rallied in Point Pleasant Beach Friday, opposing federal recommendations to cut the summer flounder quota to a level that the state DEP commissioner said is “tantamount to a moratorium.”

The state’s most popular species for recreation fishermen, summer flounder, also known as fluke, could see its quota cut by as much as 50 percent this summer under a federal rule that is currently pending. The rally followed votes last month by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) and the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) that would likely result in drastic increases the the minimum size of a legal fish and a sharp cut to the length of open season.

“Such a draconian reduction in the recreational harvest limit would be tantamount to a moratorium on one of the most popular fish sought after by recreational anglers in New Jersey, making it nearly impossible for them to keep any of the flounder they catch,” state DEP Commissioner Bob Martin said during the rally, held at the Fishermen’s Supply Company in Point Pleasant Beach. “This will cripple marinas, charter boat operators, and owners of bait-and-tackle shops, and would have severe consequences on the hotels, restaurants, and other tourism-related businesses that support anglers and their families.”

ADVERTISEMENT - STORY CONTINUES BELOW


Though summer flounder fishery stocks have grown over the past decade to near-record levels, some fisheries managers and those in the environmentalist community have still suggested cutbacks because of what they believe is a lack of future growth and “recruitment” in the species. Fishing advocates and some scientists have countered that the methodology used to collect the data on the fishery is incorrect and needs to be replaced.

Fishery managers use a combination of individual fish length, daily catch limits, and season length adjustments to achieve harvest reduction targets, or quotas. Martin said that past management of quotas for recreational and commercial fishing industries have been much too capricious, varying widely from year to year and leading to great uncertainty in both industries, as well as competitive disadvantages to New Jersey. Martin recently submitted comments to the ASMFC formally opposing the changes, he said.

Other options the ASFMC is considering range from reductions of 28 percent to 41 percent in flounder quota. Any reduction for 2017 would be on top of a 27 percent reduction New Jersey has had to implement after successfully fighting off a proposed 59 percent reduction in 2015.

A decision to cut fluke quotas could decimate the Shore economy, Martin said.

“Coming to the Jersey shore to fish for fluke is a time-honored tradition that would be placed at great risk if anglers and their families felt that there would be no point in making the trip,” he said.

Recreational fishing in New Jersey directly creates about 20,000 jobs and contributes $1.5 billion to the state’s economy, with commercial fishing generating another billion dollars in economic benefits, state data shows. 

The DEP is particularly concerned about any regulatory changes that would increase the minimum length of fish caught in New Jersey because few fish would meet the larger size limit.

“Summer flounder in New Jersey tend to be smaller than in states to the north due to the species’ biological needs and migration patterns,” the agency said in a statement. “Moreover, coast-wide more than 90 percent of summer flounder that are greater than 18 inches in length are females, meaning an increase in size limits would encourage higher harvests of reproductive fish, which is counterproductive to sound fishery management. ”

Lawmakers at Friday’s press conference included U.S. Rep. Frank Pallone and state Assemblyman Dave Rible.

The ASMFC is meeting between Jan. 30 and Feb. 2 to discuss and potentially vote on final plans for the fishery. After a plan is adopted, states will then be tasked with implementing the federal quota through their own regulations on size, season and bag limits.


SHARE
  • craigoftruth

    To DEP Commissioner Bob Martin and the short sighted fishermen/women, it boils down to this. Fish today and deplete the fluke population or wait another year and have fluke to fish for.

    • Ken Allen

      No sense in this comment. Anyone who supports a ‘stop or else’ philosophy can’t see the forest for the trees. That is tantamount to an eco-terrorism mantra. There needs to be a common ground in working on this. As usual though, the numbers being used for the proposal are erroneous. If people were going to put you out of work and your family on the street, I would hope someone would say: ‘TOO BAD, but this needs to happen.’ SLOT LIMITS?

      • craigoftruth

        I guess you do not understand, it has already been over fished and this does not take a genius to figure that out. When I was a child you could go to the bay and catch flounder, blow fish were treated as garbage fish. That is all gone now and I hope it comes back for you and your children. We over fished the waters, bullheaded the wet lands, sometimes we just have to stop and let things recover to a viable sustainable population.